edible derangements


my hood
August 26, 2008, 5:38 pm
Filed under: who am i this time? | Tags:

I’m fresh-tailed and bushy-eyed from a lengthy rummage through Gawker’s “Obama’s ‘Hood” post about my home, Hyde Park. Reading the comments section, I surprised myself by getting all defensive and sullen-like, frowning and shifting about in my chair. (But, hey, some commenters had dumb broadsides about gang violence and nerds and the like.) Up until fleeing to college, I found Hyde Park reliably suffocating. It felt like a castle with a moat – one angsty high school friend dubbed it “no better than the ‘burbs.” Shocking! Well, the moody teen of yore has a point. Frankly, HP out-bubbles Claremont. But now, returning on my own terms (sort of), all I absorb is greystone prettiness, the oak-lined streets and robin-ornamented ivy and quiet. What once seemed inbred is now sun-freckled and cozy.

at its most charming

at its most charming

Gawker referred to the Weekly Standard’s article on HP and Obama, which I only gave a shrugging glance in June and have now read in earnest. It makes strong points: Hyde Park is no ideal, and comes with its disheartening, quasi-classist baggage (re: Urban Renewal). Some apt descriptions must be applauded:

Hyde Park is “not ‘Berkeley with snow’ . . . . It’s the snow that keeps us from being Berkeley. The snow and the cold keep the street people away. It drives everyone inside. You don’t have all the students who dropped out of school or graduated and refused to leave. If they stay, they do something. If not, they get out of town. It’s too cold just to hang around.”

Furthermore: “Obama placed himself in the middle of this curious [HP, isolationist and elitist] legacy. Culturally he’s never been a ‘South Sider,’ because no one on the south side thinks of Hyde Park as a South Side neighborhood. “

I found this quote rather jarring, but it’s totally true. When folks ask which part of Chicago I’m from, my stock response is “the South Side,” because who, before this Barack upstart, had heard of Hyde Park? But it’s not part of the South Side, it’s not part of anything; it’s uprooted, an island of Great Books and down coats – the University of Chicago had even razed the neighborhood’s perimeter to weed out adjacent poverty, to make it fully lost to its surroundings.

So, as the Standard contemplates how Obama’s choice of Hyde Park represents his character, I wonder what foibles a life in the U of C’s shadow has granted me. Since coming home, I’ve become exponentially more introverted, holed up in an armchair, the way I felt on winter nights as a kid. This might be because privacy isn’t a forgone conclusion here (as in a dorm environment) . . . but I attribute my recent withdrawal to the neighborhood, how (according to the Standard) it “drives everyone inside.” It’s like I’m the inner maruschka doll: Lake Michigan within hard land, Chicago within corn fields, Hyde Park within the South Side, myself within this body. I keep considering the little things, like growing up next to St. Thomas the Apostle’s convent: we were told nuns lived inside, but we never caught a glimpse of them. Now, I soak up the environment once more: a cloistered anomaly, echoes of the cathedral’s carillon, cold and fortressed. And I’ve never felt better.



goosebumps
August 12, 2008, 11:39 am
Filed under: duh, who am i this time? | Tags: ,

At 10:30 last night, as I worsened my posture with a good book (doc says bifocals are on the horizon, not that I can see that far anyway), I heard a woman’s warbled wail from my hallway. In fact, from right outside my bedroom door. I froze, listened: it was like an elderly nymph’s vocal exercise, heard from underwater. Naturally, I assumed a schizophrenic old lady had escaped and mistaken my second floor landing for a late-night practice room. Or the ghost of Professor Rubenstein’s wife had stopped in to sing a nigun. Basically, it was really fucking spooky.

Soon enough, I sifted through an overactive imagination to the rational conclusion: mom was up, sleep-walking and sleep-singing. Nevertheless, I didn’t want to open the door. In my short, humdrum life, sleepwalking relatives top the Unsettling Experiences list. If there’s been any sight that’s convinced me of the existence of the subconscious, of a very bizarre and very real submerged shape in the human mind, seeing a family member bash a remote control against a table, with the authority of Kruschev-avec-shoe, while speaking pleasantries in a speedy monotone – all while asleep – did the trick.

After sitting completely still for several minutes, listening, I spent another three finding an appropriate blunt object. Brass lamp was out – too lazy to yank out the cord – and a Swiss army knife was too stabby. While walking about my room, picking up hard-covered books and Kirkland Signature anything, I was very conscious and sheepish about my actions. 97% of me was sure I’d just find mom in a nightgown, but that other suspicious 3% was very vocal, insisting that a vulnerable, sleeping mother could attack. It was shocking: am I really this nuts?

I found a heavy tennis racquet, and slipped into the hallway. No one else was up. I should know; I turned on every light I passed.

So, it’s official: like a good American, I can be near crippled with fear.

BOO!



i was born a ramblin’ woman
July 31, 2008, 10:13 pm
Filed under: wagons ho, who am i this time? | Tags: , , , ,

i have a history of crying on airplanes. the triggers are probably numerous, but let’s get efficient for once and boil it down to the anxiety of travel. there are the oft discussed, more physical stresses of airports (draconian security procedures, delays and cancellations, bags blithely wheeled over toes, expensive bottles of water). but we shan’t forget the collywobble-enducing significances of traveling, more subtle, more psychological: farewells, transitions, being with dozens of others in a closed capsule a gazillion feet over hard water and no one saying a word (see billy collins’s “passengers”), the fleeting nature of any given life chapter, the sensation that we’re wayfarers and drifters all of us. apparently, it’s enough to make a girl cry.

and, so, a selected (but lengthy, yowza) breakdown of my trail of tears:

- picture this: july, 1996.* i’m susceptible to motion-sickness. i’ve tried a catalog of pharmaceutical and homeopathic remedies (i still can’t taste straight ginger without gagging), but my inner ear’s an uncooperate jerk. at ten years old, my flight home from kansas (mennonite family reunion: talent show, parkinson’s, strudel) was no exception. and, worse: it was my birthday. (my favorite gift was mall madness.) some ill-fated, very polite guy smiled nervously in the adjacent seat. and so, as we hit the turbulent final descent, holding a grey courtesy bag in one hand and my mom’s palm in the other, i closed my eyes and felt my stomach orbit my throat. this was my cue to hurl, but something odd happened. in an epiphany i will momentarily attribute to inspiration (see the new yorker’s “the eureka hunt”), i realized that maybe i could think through the nausea, concentrate very, very hard on not throwing up. a harrowing ten minutes followed. i thought in belly-flopped dictums: you can do it. you don’t have to ralph; you are in control of your stomach. the man next to me edged to the far side of his seat; i held my resolve. and, suddenly, the wheels touched ground. i looked up and around at a new world, one in which willpower triumphs! i couldn’t stop smiling; i believe that from that point on, i put my faith unconditionally (and perhaps detrimentally) in the mind, the power of thought. i felt formidable, finally responsible for myself. i felt grown up. and so i cried. my mom asked what was wrong. “i’m just so happy i didn’t throw up!” “me too,” said the guy next to me.

* r.i.p. estelle getty

- two months ago, i visited my grandparents in north newton, kansas. here’s a secret: they are the sweetest, most empathetic 90-year-olds ever, so call off the best elderly people search. they were new age before the age of aquarius and “green” when the only crucial political color was red. kansas visits are a medley of poppyseed rolls, jungian maxims, foot massages and tomato picking. on my final day, i bought a jar of strawberry-rhubarb jam from a local farmer’s outlet. i have an affinity for rhubarb, as well as wheat fields and my lovable – and frail – grandparents. the jam was a prized souvenir. later, when negotiating airport security’s obstacle course, the tsa screener found the jam noteworthy, too. her interest, though, lay in the substance’s liquidity; it would have to be tossed. i understood this; there was nothing to be done. rules are rules. and yet my reaction was absurd; i just started sobbing. although the tsa screener was tough, she had a midwestern heart, and asked if i wanted it shipped or anything: kleenex? i declined, my fingers dripping with mascara run-off. when crying in public, i generally carry on as if nothing’s abnormal. my face isn’t contorting awfully, my breathing isn’t jagged! so, i collected my shoes and slung my bag onto my back and trudged on, until i realized i couldn’t read the gate listings because tears obscured my glasses. at the time, the incident was puzzling and laughable – silly old sensitive me, crying over confiscated jam! – but it’s clear now: my grandparents are 90. grandma has a hole in her heart, grandpa has macular degeneration. my quiet, breezy visits to kansas are numbered.

-and, today, coming into los angeleees: i received peter jackson’s heavenly creatures on netflix, and gave it a go on the plane. It was beautiful; go see it. but, bizarrely, I cried while watching it; i don’t cry during movies (unless it’s bergman or i’m eleven and watching titanic). with the plane full and the flight attendants frequenting with drink refills, i kept turning my face toward the window, quickly wiping away tears from the bridge of my glasses. (advantage to long hair: easy face concealment). the movie struck a nerve. i don’t want to shove spoilers down your throat, so, simply: in digesting the movie’s themes, my thoughts extrapolated to myself, self-centered little so-and-so that i am. i thought about how we compensate for insecurities and the disappointments in our lives by creating fantasies to live by, to wholly depend on…and how we also fixate on people whose importance we magnify and then whose attention we depend upon…and to what degree is fantasy (or, alternately, lying to ourselves) key to coping with this rocky world? is this detachment from reality alarming or necessary? apparently i got rather worked up brooding over this, because air travel cry #27 commenced (over and over and over). now, why don’t i see more fellow travelers bawling while watching distant landscapes slip by below?

so, here’s to a good cry, followed by some dabs with airline napkins dusted with peanut salt. may there be many more!

as a coda, I’d recommend heavenly creatures also because of the wacky, dead alive-esque fantasy scenes: knives emerging from stomachs! extreme close-ups of waxy faces! frolicking men of clay!



hey, wasn’t pavement’s “cut your hair” in clueless?
July 20, 2008, 10:51 pm
Filed under: dithering, duh, who am i this time? | Tags: , ,

hey dudes! i cut my own bangs! here’s a mini photo diary documenting the transformation:

before

gosh, this hair makes me feel so unattractive! limp, lifeless, tyra-forehead revealing – but who wants to spend a reasonable sum on a quality haircut by an experienced professional stylist when there are so many Nancy Drew mysteries to purchase, nickel milkshakes to guzzle down, and precocious faces to make? (N.B. chronicle books now sells nancy drew merch.)

what i really need is a new look to wow bobby and to add some pizzaz (razmaraz) to my life. so: i’m going to get . . . MY BANGS CUT.

after

whoaoaoohoa! what have i done! guess i shouldn’t have used dad’s cuticle scissors.

in the long run

eventually, i’ll come to accept the hair snafu. the short, stiff bangs + glasses look perfectly accompanies the m.a. in library science i’ll bitterly take out student loans for when all my other plans fail. and, hey, with my fun-loving antics, accidents are bound to happen. when life gives you lemons, make lemonade!!

in conclusion: an homage to the hairdresser

tease-a-louise!